Elvis Presley’s Graceland mansion in Memphis dodged a bullet recently. A legal battle erupted after a mysterious company attempted to sell the iconic property through what appears to be a fraudulent loan. Thankfully, the Presley family secured a court victory, but the saga has exposed a web of secrecy and raised questions about the attempted sale.
The drama unfolded when Riley Keough, Elvis’s granddaughter, filed a lawsuit alleging forgery. Keough claimed her late mother, Lisa Marie Presley’s signature, was forged on a loan used as collateral to seize Graceland. This eleventh-hour legal action successfully halted a scheduled auction, preventing the King’s home from falling into unknown hands. The judge’s decision acknowledged the potential devastation of selling Graceland and ensured fans can continue visiting this significant landmark.
However, the identity of the company behind the attempted sale remains a puzzling enigma. Naussany Investments & Private Lending, the culprit named in the lawsuit, seems to be a ghost. Public record searches and online investigations yielded no results for the company. The addresses listed for Naussany are all post office boxes, and attempts to contact them through phone numbers and emails proved futile. The situation became even more bizarre with conflicting responses from someone claiming to be Kurt Naussany. First, a disconnected phone number and an email stating his departure from the company years ago emerged. Then, a follow-up email from the same address contradicted this, denying any involvement with the Presley loan.
Adding another layer of mystery, a fax supposedly from Gregory E. Naussany surfaced, refuting Keough’s claims and promising future evidence. This individual also suggested the Presley family was unaware of Lisa Marie Presley’s financial troubles. The Presley family has secured Graceland for now, but the unanswered questions surrounding Naussany Investments and the attempted sale linger. Was this an elaborate forgery scheme? Who are the people behind this company? The complexities of this case underscore the importance of vigilance in protecting valuable assets and the lengths some might go to for financial gain. Hopefully, future court proceedings will shed light on these lingering mysteries.
