{"id":7717,"date":"2025-05-11T22:35:12","date_gmt":"2025-05-11T14:35:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/?p=7717"},"modified":"2025-05-11T22:35:12","modified_gmt":"2025-05-11T14:35:12","slug":"ai-trainings-copyright-crossroads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/2025\/05\/ai-trainings-copyright-crossroads\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Training\u2019s Copyright Crossroads"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">Reading Time : <\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> 2<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minutes<\/span><\/span><p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>The rise of generative AI has pushed copyright law into uncharted territory. Training large language models often involves scraping vast amounts of online content\u2014much of which is copyrighted. This practice is now under intense legal scrutiny, and the outcomes could redefine the rules for building AI systems. Courts are beginning to weigh in, and their decisions may fundamentally alter how models are trained and what data can be used.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-7718\" src=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z2-2.webp\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"385\" srcset=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z2-2.webp 1000w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z2-2-300x116.webp 300w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z2-2-768x296.webp 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">One of the key legal cases in this space involves Thomson Reuters suing Ross Intelligence. The case centered around Ross\u2019s use of Westlaw headnotes\u2014specially prepared legal summaries\u2014to train a non-generative AI legal search engine. The court ruled this did not fall under fair use, a decision that sent ripples through the AI development world. While Ross wasn\u2019t using generative AI like GPT or Claude, the case still raised questions about how much data use is too much without permission.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-7719\" src=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"684\" srcset=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z3.png 1000w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z3-300x205.png 300w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z3-768x525.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Meanwhile, The New York Times has taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, arguing that its articles were used without authorization to train generative models like ChatGPT. This case is particularly significant because it directly addresses generative AI and copyrighted journalism. The court has decided the case can proceed, which means we\u2019re likely to get more clarity in the coming months or years about the legal boundaries of AI training.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-7720\" src=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z4-10.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1000\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z4-10.jpg 1000w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z4-10-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/z4-10-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For now, there\u2019s no one-size-fits-all answer. Some experts argue that using data for training models can be considered transformative and thus protected under fair use. Others say AI companies will eventually have to strike licensing deals to access high-quality content legally. Until the courts make definitive rulings\u2014or lawmakers step in\u2014AI developers are navigating a gray area that could shape the future of tech and creative work alike.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5125\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5125\" style=\"width: 1000px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5125\" src=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Ben-footer-mar2024-1000.png\" alt=\"B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Lin \u2013 Brussels, Paris, London, Seoul, Bangkok, Tokyo, New York, Taipei, Hong Kong\" width=\"1000\" height=\"379\" srcset=\"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Ben-footer-mar2024-1000.png 1000w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Ben-footer-mar2024-1000-300x114.png 300w, https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Ben-footer-mar2024-1000-768x291.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5125\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Lin \u2013 Brussels, Paris, London, Seoul, Bangkok, Tokyo, New York, Taipei, Hong Kong<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>#AI #Copyright #LegalBattle #EmergingTech #FairUse<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">Reading Time : <\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> 2<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minutes<\/span><\/span> This article explores key lawsuits shaping the legality of AI training with copyrighted material. As courts begin to rule on cases involving Thomson Reuters, OpenAI, and others, the future of how AI models are trained may be transformed. Legal clarity remains elusive, but these battles are defining the boundaries between innovation and content ownership.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7721,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[374,201,345],"tags":[397,207,206,19,4,281,94,154],"class_list":["post-7717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","category-everydays-chit-chat","category-futur","tag-397","tag-ai","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-benedicte","tag-gout-design","tag-justice","tag-money","tag-society"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7717"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7722,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7717\/revisions\/7722"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goutanddesign.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}